Class Notes Wiki |
|
Recently Visited
Swank v0.04.04 |
Attachments: Macroeconomics Slideshowsource: http://www.slideshare.net/MrRed/chapter-19-classical-vs-keynesian NotesSlide 1Classicals, also known as Austrian school. Advocates a pure free market system. All government ("G") interference is bad. (Out of consideration even) Keynesianism, started in 1930's (great depression seen as a failure of classical economics), advocates using Government spending and Taxation to smooth market fluctuations. Using many of its tactics since Nixon. Monetarists, also known as Chicago School, is a partial return to classical principles. 1970's stagflation seen as a failure of Keynesianism. Mainstreamers incorporate principles from all these schools. Slide 5Don't really assume a vertical supply curve. That says, "the same amount of good are available at all prices." Example: Mickey Mantle rookie baseball cards, because they cannot be produced any more. Full employment means wages are easily lowered until there are enough (possibly poverty-level) jobs for all. Say's Law: "products are paid for with products" (can ignore intermediate money/product transactions) Modern version: "Supply creates its own demand" Slide 6Vertical supply curve is typical of a Keynesian explaining classical economics. Slide 10In economics, laissez-faire describes an environment in which transactions between private parties are free from state intervention, including restrictive regulations, taxes, tariffs and enforced monopolies. The phrase laissez-faire is French and means "leave it alone." (Without regulations, how do you know they are respecting free market principles?) AD = Aggregate Demand, AS = Aggregate Supply Downwardly Inflexible means people and companies don't want to give up their high wages and prices. (In classical economics, for prices to go down, other people have to come to take their jobs, and other companies have to undersell them.) Slide 12Keynesian view shows unemployment instead of decreased wages, which is exactly what a classical economist says results from minimum wages, whether imposed by government or unions. (But the classical economist simply says "that's bad" and doesn't try to figure out any other way to fix it.) Slide 14Keynesian solution: (more) government intervention Slide 16MV = PQ M = Money Supply, V = Velocity (rate of exchange of money/goods), P = Prices, Q = Quantity Hence, more money causes rising prices (inflation). Slide 18Stable Velocity assumption Slide 19(see also slide 26) Why? When some prices go up, others must fall. The goal is a stable economy without price drops. So instead of falling, "losers" can maintain a constant price, while "winners" go up (even more). This avoids all the messiness (see above) required in order for prices and wages to actually fall in the free market. 3-5% is also the long-term inflation rate. Coincidence? Slide 20Rational thinking defeats all economic policies. e.g. Employees demand yearly 3-5% "cost-of-living" raise just keep up with inflation. Slide 22Interest Rate and Money Supply are the tools the Fed uses to regulate the economy. Slide 23C + I + X + G = GDP C = Consumption (aggregate household spending), I = Investment (i.e. business spending), Xn = Exports (net: Exports - Imports), G = Government Spending, GDP = Gross Domestic Product (Aggregate Demand) Therefore Government Spending is a big factor in the equation. Slide 24Macro-Instability means booms and busts. Investment = Business spending. Mainstream blames business, expects government to provide solution via Fed. Monetarist... (assumes stability??) Slide 26rise in GDP implies rise in quantity. Assuming vertical supply, implies drop in prices. But prices and wages are downwardly inflexible, creating instability. Slide 27increase money supply at same rate of rise in GDP --> (hopefully) stable prices |